|
|
Posted by: Jill Abitbol Competitors Sanderson Farms and Perdue Farms sued Tyson for nationally advertising its chicken as "Raised Without Antibiotics" and "Raised Without Antibiotics that impact antibiotic resistance in humans." A federal court recently issued a preliminary injunction ordering Tyson Foods to withdraw the advertisements at issue, finding that the ads are false and misleading to the consumer and could violate the Lanham Act's false advertising prohibition. The competitors clearly stated a claim upon which relief could be granted by asserting the unqualified advertising claim "Raised Without Antibiotics" was literally false, the court held. The qualified claim was also found to be false and misleading to the consumer public despite the USDA's determination that it was not. The court held that the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the USDA conducted a highly technical and scientific review of the proposed label language; however, it did not involve a review of whether the language was misleading to the consumer when combined with images and promotional slogans. The competitors submitted a consumer survey to demonstrate the consumer confusion, which included 608 consumers in twenty-eight shopping malls across the United States. Indeed, the court found the survey was "compelling evidence of consumer confusion." |
Topics
Copyright, Trademark and Other Intellectual Property Recent UpdatesAugust 06, 2008 August 05, 2008 August 05, 2008 July 29, 2008 July 23, 2008 Archives
August, 2008 Web ResourcesFindLaw |
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2008 by The Lustigman Firm, P.C. Attorneys. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |